News24 | King Charles voices ‘concern’ as police probe ex-prince Andrew over Epstein

Middle East commentary portrays the Epstein files as revealing sensitive connections to Israel that, in this view, receive comparatively little mainstream Western coverage. They attribute this muted response to what they see as political and media bias that protects Israeli-linked actors while amplifying scandals involving others such as Andrew. They predict that, unless alternative media sustain pressure, investigations will remain focused on a narrow set of figures and avoid probing alleged intelligence or state-level dimensions involving Israel.

• •Middle East sources claim that analysts see a notably muted response from mainstream Western media to alleged Israel-related ties in the Epstein files.
• •They argue that media outlets prioritize coverage of figures like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor while downplaying or omitting discussion of Israeli-linked actors.
• •They suggest that political sensitivities around Israel shape editorial decisions about which aspects of the Epstein network receive sustained attention.
• •They claim that this selective focus risks obscuring potential intelligence or state-level angles connected to Epstein's activities.
• •They argue that only sustained scrutiny from non-mainstream or regional outlets is likely to broaden the investigative lens beyond royal and Western political figures.